DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 195787

Client ID: f03064811

Report Detail
Report 195787 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

2.51 days

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
6 issues
Number of providers: 10

f02826123

Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

395 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.58%

Deal Percentage

50% / 197.5 TiB

Duplication

195957

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02826234

Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

187.63 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.08%

Deal Percentage

10.48% / 19.66 TiB

Duplication

100934

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02827151

Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

585.34 TiB

Total Deal Size

12.72%

Deal Percentage

1.29% / 7.53 TiB

Duplication

109452

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02827694

Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

199.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.34%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

112266

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02956383

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

582.13 TiB

Total Deal Size

12.65%

Deal Percentage

0.01% / 32 GiB

Duplication

182184

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02980903

Seoul, Seoul, KR

Sample Piece URL not found

645.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

14.03%

Deal Percentage

0.16% / 1.03 TiB

Duplication

215446

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03046248

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

149.41 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.25%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

67891

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03064819

Seoul, Seoul, KR

Sample Piece URL not found

591.59 TiB

Total Deal Size

12.85%

Deal Percentage

49.29% / 291.63 TiB

Duplication

95723

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03066382

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

197.06 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.28%

Deal Percentage

0.24% / 480 GiB

Duplication

33782

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03079511

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

1.04 PiB

Total Deal Size

23.21%

Deal Percentage

0% / 32 GiB

Duplication

177419

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
9
59 TiB
647.44 TiB
14.06%
1
561.66 TiB
561.69 TiB
12.2%
6
19.69 TiB
137.91 TiB
2.99%
5
83.84 TiB
500.63 TiB
10.87%
7
14.34 TiB
121.66 TiB
2.64%
2
70.94 TiB
141.97 TiB
3.08%
8
25.97 TiB
258.09 TiB
5.6%
3
109.84 TiB
336.31 TiB
7.3%
10
104.75 TiB
1.24 PiB
27.53%
4
156.91 TiB
629.69 TiB
13.68%
1.18 PiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.