Enterprise
Yes
10
0.41 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN
Sample Piece URL not found
326.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.72%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
96269
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
317.22 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.39%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
74523
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
382.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
13.74%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
100998
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
366.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
13.18%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
101139
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Taipei, Taiwan, TW
Sample Piece URL not found
319.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.46%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
96148
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
323.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.63%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
96004
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Taipei, Taiwan, TW
Sample Piece URL not found
377.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
13.55%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
95482
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN
Sample Piece URL not found
371.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
13.32%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
95864
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 123.72 TiB | 742.31 TiB | 26.65% |
| 8 | 53 TiB | 424 TiB | 15.22% |
| 1 | 87.44 TiB | 87.44 TiB | 3.14% |
| 5 | 162.03 TiB | 810.16 TiB | 29.09% |
| 4 | 42.81 TiB | 171.25 TiB | 6.15% |
| 2 | 93.66 TiB | 187.31 TiB | 6.72% |
| 7 | 51.66 TiB | 361.59 TiB | 12.98% |
| 3 | 160 GiB | 480 GiB | 0.01% |
| 614.47 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| f03699579 | 467.28 TiB | 3000 |