f03099008
Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN
298.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.17%
Deal Percentage
0.23% / 704 GiB
Duplication
120603
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
Yes
10
0.89 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN
298.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.17%
Deal Percentage
0.23% / 704 GiB
Duplication
120603
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
São Paulo, São Paulo, BR
290.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
6%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
105783
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE
358.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.39%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
138019
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Mountain View, California, US
334.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.91%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
138153
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Mountain View, California, US
407.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.41%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
72989
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE
428.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.86%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
72925
Total Claims
98%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
795.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
16.42%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
141956
Total Claims
98%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
746.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
15.41%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
141111
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
445.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.19%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
158983
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
445.41 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.19%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
155557
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
293.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.05%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
113671
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1.88 TiB | 3.75 TiB | 0.07% |
| 6 | 9.09 TiB | 54.56 TiB | 1.12% |
| 8 | 365.72 TiB | 2.86 PiB | 60.39% |
| 7 | 40.22 TiB | 281.53 TiB | 5.81% |
| 5 | 57.81 TiB | 289.06 TiB | 5.96% |
| 1 | 14 TiB | 14 TiB | 0.28% |
| 3 | 15.38 TiB | 46.13 TiB | 0.95% |
| 4 | 307.19 TiB | 1.2 PiB | 25.37% |
| 811.28 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||