f01269519
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
250 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.66%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
24408
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
0.21 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
250 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.66%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
24408
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Johor Bahru, Johor, MY
707.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
21.68%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
62455
Total Claims
6%
RPA
6%
Consistent RPA
94%
Inconsistent RPA
10497 ms
Time to First Byte
56.16 Mbps
Bandwidth
Johor Bahru, Johor, MY
707.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
21.68%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
60643
Total Claims
8%
RPA
8%
Consistent RPA
92%
Inconsistent RPA
10485 ms
Time to First Byte
55.16 Mbps
Bandwidth
Bạch Mai, Hanoi, VN
691 TiB
Total Deal Size
21.17%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
40984
Total Claims
56%
RPA
56%
Consistent RPA
44%
Inconsistent RPA
10462 ms
Time to First Byte
8.56 Mbps
Bandwidth
Bạch Mai, Hanoi, VN
658 TiB
Total Deal Size
20.15%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
29083
Total Claims
66%
RPA
66%
Consistent RPA
34%
Inconsistent RPA
10449 ms
Time to First Byte
4.9 Mbps
Bandwidth
Bạch Mai, Hanoi, VN
250 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.66%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
24409
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
10463 ms
Time to First Byte
6.18 Mbps
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 33 TiB | 99 TiB | 3.03% |
| 4 | 658 TiB | 2.57 PiB | 80.61% |
| 2 | 266.88 TiB | 533.75 TiB | 16.34% |
| 957.88 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||