DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 285834

Client ID: f03646622

Report Detail
Report 285834 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

0.50 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
2 issues
Number of providers: 8

f03644142

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

681.38 TiB

Total Deal Size

13.48%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

98873

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03645007

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

680.41 TiB

Total Deal Size

13.46%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

99290

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03645883

Seoul, Seoul, KR

Sample Piece URL not found

594.06 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.75%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

89773

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03645884

Seoul, Seoul, KR

Sample Piece URL not found

636.06 TiB

Total Deal Size

12.58%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

91708

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03645885

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

626.41 TiB

Total Deal Size

12.39%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

94215

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03646493

Tokyo, Tokyo, JP

Sample Piece URL not found

625.84 TiB

Total Deal Size

12.38%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

89551

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03663680

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

609.59 TiB

Total Deal Size

12.06%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

100998

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03663684

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

602.53 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.92%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

101139

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
Healthy
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
8
349.28 TiB
2.73 PiB
55.26%
7
36.5 TiB
255.5 TiB
5.05%
5
41.5 TiB
207.5 TiB
4.1%
3
928 GiB
2.72 TiB
0.05%
6
219.63 TiB
1.29 PiB
26.06%
2
168.25 TiB
336.5 TiB
6.65%
4
35.19 TiB
140.75 TiB
2.78%
1
1.31 TiB
1.31 TiB
0.02%
852.56 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.