f03315260
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE
Sample Piece URL not found
27.22 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.34%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
224838
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
Yes
10
1.77 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE
Sample Piece URL not found
27.22 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.34%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
224838
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN
Sample Piece URL not found
16.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.61%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
91228
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
São Paulo, São Paulo, BR
Sample Piece URL not found
26.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.12%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
67475
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
14315 ms
Time to First Byte
5.39 Mbps
Bandwidth
Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN
Sample Piece URL not found
3.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.39%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
39911
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE
Sample Piece URL not found
2.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.12%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
39872
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Mountain View, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
35.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
16.27%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
73638
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
11050 ms
Time to First Byte
4.76 Mbps
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
30 TiB
Total Deal Size
13.61%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
141956
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
13084 ms
Time to First Byte
6.85 Mbps
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
35.84 TiB
Total Deal Size
16.26%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
155557
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
17.28 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.84%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
62051
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
12958 ms
Time to First Byte
7.24 Mbps
Bandwidth
São Paulo, São Paulo, BR
Sample Piece URL not found
25.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.45%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
37881
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 17.5 TiB | 70 TiB | 31.74% |
| 1 | 960 GiB | 960 GiB | 0.42% |
| 5 | 17.84 TiB | 89.22 TiB | 40.46% |
| 2 | 7.81 TiB | 15.63 TiB | 7.08% |
| 3 | 14.91 TiB | 44.72 TiB | 20.28% |
| 59 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| f03633013 | 34.88 TiB | 564 |