f01828146
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
352.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
15.41%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
43691
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
1.45 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
352.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
15.41%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
43691
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ürümqi, Xinjiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
253 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.06%
Deal Percentage
2.47% / 6.25 TiB
Duplication
97099
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
252.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.04%
Deal Percentage
2.47% / 6.25 TiB
Duplication
97277
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ürümqi, Xinjiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
253 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.06%
Deal Percentage
2.48% / 6.28 TiB
Duplication
98003
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
252.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.05%
Deal Percentage
2.47% / 6.25 TiB
Duplication
99146
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
San Francisco, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
113.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.95%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
15547
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
226.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.9%
Deal Percentage
2.3% / 5.22 TiB
Duplication
112669
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
114.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.99%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
32218
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
470.22 TiB
Total Deal Size
20.55%
Deal Percentage
1.26% / 5.94 TiB
Duplication
109492
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 25.03 TiB | 125.31 TiB | 5.47% |
| 2 | 101.72 TiB | 203.44 TiB | 8.89% |
| 4 | 19.97 TiB | 79.88 TiB | 3.49% |
| 1 | 378.31 TiB | 378.31 TiB | 16.53% |
| 3 | 54 TiB | 162 TiB | 7.07% |
| 7 | 11.88 TiB | 83.13 TiB | 3.63% |
| 6 | 203.34 TiB | 1.23 PiB | 54.89% |
| 794.25 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||