f02029742
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
255.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.39%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
131375
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
0.64 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
255.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.39%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
131375
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Xining, Qinghai, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
579.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
28.07%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 32 GiB
Duplication
65696
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Beijing, Beijing, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
200 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.69%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
67411
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
483.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
23.42%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 32 GiB
Duplication
132508
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
545.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
26.42%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 64 GiB
Duplication
132137
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 279.41 TiB | 838.34 TiB | 40.6% |
| 5 | 185.06 TiB | 925.31 TiB | 44.81% |
| 4 | 39.94 TiB | 159.75 TiB | 7.73% |
| 2 | 47.16 TiB | 94.31 TiB | 4.56% |
| 1 | 47.16 TiB | 47.16 TiB | 2.28% |
| 598.72 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||