DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 162505

Client ID: f03543313

Report Detail
Report 162505 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

2.02 days

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
4 issues
Number of providers: 10

f02866013

Moscow, Moscow, RU

Sample Piece URL not found

164.91 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.21%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

35093

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02869125

Paris, Île-de-France, FR

Sample Piece URL not found

184 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.27%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

54147

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02874347

Los Angeles, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

261.22 TiB

Total Deal Size

14.58%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

54408

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02893152

Hanoi, Hanoi, VN

Sample Piece URL not found

133.75 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.47%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

35104

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02916974

Los Angeles, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

167.38 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.34%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

53869

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02924003

New York City, New York, US

Sample Piece URL not found

164.25 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.17%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

35093

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02930717

Paris, Île-de-France, FR

Sample Piece URL not found

265.56 TiB

Total Deal Size

14.82%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

48008

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02952530

Bangkok, Bangkok, TH

Sample Piece URL not found

144.47 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.06%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

28322

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03233304

New York City, New York, US

Sample Piece URL not found

181.31 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.12%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

35192

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03233356

Seoul, Seoul, KR

Sample Piece URL not found

124.63 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.96%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

60753

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
10
288 GiB
2.81 TiB
0.15%
2
1.19 TiB
2.38 TiB
0.13%
7
9.06 TiB
63.44 TiB
3.54%
9
26.81 TiB
241.31 TiB
13.47%
4
208.88 TiB
835.5 TiB
46.63%
5
41.97 TiB
209.84 TiB
11.71%
1
16.06 TiB
16.06 TiB
0.89%
3
32.44 TiB
97.31 TiB
5.43%
8
34.47 TiB
275.75 TiB
15.39%
6
7.84 TiB
47.06 TiB
2.62%
379 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.