f02826126
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
838.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
14.91%
Deal Percentage
0.03% / 224 GiB
Duplication
83395
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
0.10 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
838.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
14.91%
Deal Percentage
0.03% / 224 GiB
Duplication
83395
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ürümqi, Xinjiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
832.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
14.81%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 192 GiB
Duplication
83213
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ürümqi, Xinjiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
809.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
14.39%
Deal Percentage
0.03% / 224 GiB
Duplication
83081
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
840.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
14.95%
Deal Percentage
0.04% / 320 GiB
Duplication
84608
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Paris, Île-de-France, FR
Sample Piece URL not found
66.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.18%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
54403
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
66.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.18%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
54209
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Bangkok, Bangkok, TH
Sample Piece URL not found
63.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.13%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
28539
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
70.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.25%
Deal Percentage
0.04% / 32 GiB
Duplication
42534
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
66.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.17%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
63134
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
691.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.3%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
162144
Total Claims
0%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
377.67 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.72%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
221502
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
77.33 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.38%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
84198
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
154.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.74%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
146326
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
163.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.9%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
36782
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
505.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.99%
Deal Percentage
1.62% / 8.22 TiB
Duplication
97025
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 31.11 TiB | 93.33 TiB | 1.65% |
| 8 | 132.94 TiB | 1.04 PiB | 18.91% |
| 7 | 158.97 TiB | 1.09 PiB | 19.78% |
| 2 | 1.39 TiB | 2.78 TiB | 0.04% |
| 5 | 136.78 TiB | 685.22 TiB | 12.18% |
| 4 | 307.47 TiB | 1.2 PiB | 21.87% |
| 6 | 186.84 TiB | 1.1 PiB | 20.06% |
| 9 | 17.19 TiB | 154.69 TiB | 2.75% |
| 1 | 152.27 TiB | 152.3 TiB | 2.7% |
| 1.1 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||