DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 191478

Client ID: f03498278

Report Detail
Report 191478 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

0.22 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
6 issues
Number of providers: 11

f01996719

Beijing, Beijing, CN

251.03 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.91%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

94523

Total Claims

52%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02866013

Moscow, Moscow, RU

Sample Piece URL not found

19.94 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.31%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

35093

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03233304

New York City, New York, US

Sample Piece URL not found

20 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.31%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

35192

Total Claims

0%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03253403

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

740.25 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.53%

Deal Percentage

0.05% / 416 GiB

Duplication

41421

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03312989

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

957.66 TiB

Total Deal Size

14.91%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

162144

Total Claims

0%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03328971

Shanghai, Shanghai, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

418 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.51%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

18314

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03358608

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

988.94 TiB

Total Deal Size

15.4%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

221502

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03363420

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

790.84 TiB

Total Deal Size

12.31%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

84198

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03380845

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

914.13 TiB

Total Deal Size

14.23%

Deal Percentage

6.1% / 55.75 TiB

Duplication

45461

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03499325

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

736.66 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.47%

Deal Percentage

0% / 32 GiB

Duplication

36782

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03519438

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

585.16 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.11%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

97025

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
2 issues
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
6
277.47 TiB
1.67 PiB
26.61%
7
473.34 TiB
3.25 PiB
51.76%
8
17.41 TiB
139.25 TiB
2.16%
2
19.94 TiB
39.88 TiB
0.62%
5
94 TiB
470.44 TiB
7.32%
4
106.19 TiB
424.75 TiB
6.61%
3
352 GiB
1.03 TiB
0.01%
1
313.28 TiB
313.28 TiB
4.87%
1.27 PiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.