f01313
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
79.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.36%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
132537
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
1.07 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
79.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.36%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
132537
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
171 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.22%
Deal Percentage
0.04% / 64 GiB
Duplication
128876
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
45.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.93%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
45878
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
85.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.63%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75037
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
52.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.2%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
220891
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
64 GiB
Total Deal Size
0%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
84004
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
259.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.94%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 64 GiB
Duplication
146237
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
250.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.59%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 64 GiB
Duplication
104380
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
206.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.7%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 32 GiB
Duplication
104476
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
287.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.16%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
122991
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
92.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.92%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
15925
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
221.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.34%
Deal Percentage
0.03% / 64 GiB
Duplication
83006
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Beijing, Beijing, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
287.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.15%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 32 GiB
Duplication
62066
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
247.41 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.45%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 32 GiB
Duplication
131095
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Nanjing, Jiangsu, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
80.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.41%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
117780
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 7.09 TiB | 21.28 TiB | 0.89% |
| 5 | 21.72 TiB | 108.59 TiB | 4.58% |
| 11 | 54.81 TiB | 603 TiB | 25.45% |
| 8 | 9.75 TiB | 78.03 TiB | 3.29% |
| 7 | 12.28 TiB | 85.97 TiB | 3.62% |
| 1 | 1.94 TiB | 1.94 TiB | 0.08% |
| 4 | 3.09 TiB | 12.38 TiB | 0.52% |
| 12 | 96 GiB | 1.13 TiB | 0.04% |
| 9 | 29.25 TiB | 263.31 TiB | 11.11% |
| 6 | 20 TiB | 120.03 TiB | 5.06% |
| 2 | 27.13 TiB | 54.25 TiB | 2.29% |
| 10 | 101.84 TiB | 1018.59 TiB | 43% |
| 289 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||