f01222595
Moscow, Moscow, RU
Sample Piece URL not found
268.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
29.16%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
25080
Total Claims
100%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
Yes
10
6.47 days
Client is receiving DataCap from multiple allocators.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Moscow, Moscow, RU
Sample Piece URL not found
268.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
29.16%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
25080
Total Claims
100%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
253.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
27.53%
Deal Percentage
1.57% / 3.97 TiB
Duplication
8111
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
21.4 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.33%
Deal Percentage
6.72% / 1.44 TiB
Duplication
1542
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
108.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.8%
Deal Percentage
1.38% / 1.5 TiB
Duplication
4649
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
28.58 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.11%
Deal Percentage
0.66% / 192 GiB
Duplication
1517
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
100.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.92%
Deal Percentage
3.05% / 3.06 TiB
Duplication
3586
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
139.51 TiB
Total Deal Size
15.16%
Deal Percentage
0.04% / 64 GiB
Duplication
4462
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 19.35 TiB | 58.12 TiB | 6.31% |
| 5 | 71.78 TiB | 362.75 TiB | 39.41% |
| 6 | 5.72 TiB | 34.38 TiB | 3.73% |
| 2 | 100.95 TiB | 205.86 TiB | 22.36% |
| 7 | 992 GiB | 6.81 TiB | 0.74% |
| 1 | 24.06 TiB | 24.06 TiB | 2.61% |
| 4 | 56.52 TiB | 228.31 TiB | 24.8% |
| 279.34 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| f03231720 | 32 GiB | 1 |
| f03253574 | 29.91 TiB | 908 |
| f0undefined | 2.19 TiB | 70 |