f0101020
Zhengzhou, Henan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
403.68 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.05%
Deal Percentage
0.56% / 2.25 TiB
Duplication
26731
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
Yes
10
6.07 days
Client is receiving DataCap from multiple allocators.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Zhengzhou, Henan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
403.68 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.05%
Deal Percentage
0.56% / 2.25 TiB
Duplication
26731
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Beijing, Beijing, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
410.55 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.23%
Deal Percentage
0.36% / 1.48 TiB
Duplication
27210
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Zhengzhou, Henan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
408.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.18%
Deal Percentage
0.32% / 1.32 TiB
Duplication
27065
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Columbus, Ohio, US
Sample Piece URL not found
408.4 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.18%
Deal Percentage
0.35% / 1.44 TiB
Duplication
27049
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ashburn, Virginia, US
Sample Piece URL not found
327.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.96%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
48363
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
12043 ms
Time to First Byte
4.87 Mbps
Bandwidth
Columbus, Ohio, US
Sample Piece URL not found
323.35 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.85%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
45898
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
11386 ms
Time to First Byte
6.35 Mbps
Bandwidth
Zhengzhou, Henan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
324.71 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.89%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
45850
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ashburn, Virginia, US
Sample Piece URL not found
405.05 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.08%
Deal Percentage
0.44% / 1.77 TiB
Duplication
26823
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
318.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.71%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
45787
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ashburn, Virginia, US
Sample Piece URL not found
324.64 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.88%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
46149
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15.24 TiB | 15.27 TiB | 0.41% |
| 5 | 612.33 TiB | 3 PiB | 83.95% |
| 4 | 80.43 TiB | 322.7 TiB | 8.83% |
| 2 | 36 TiB | 72.09 TiB | 1.97% |
| 3 | 58.56 TiB | 176.16 TiB | 4.82% |
| 802.57 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| f03258177 | 95.11 TiB | 2677 |
| f0undefined | 656 GiB | 40 |