DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 317842

Client ID: f03315321

Report Detail
Report 317842 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

0.87 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
7 issues
Number of providers: 8

f01660795

Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

100 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.55%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

164687

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02029742

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

129.03 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.45%

Deal Percentage

0.02% / 32 GiB

Duplication

131375

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03088052

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

19.38 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.27%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

319116

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03099981

Beijing, Beijing, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

392.47 TiB

Total Deal Size

25.7%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

193151

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03099987

Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH

Sample Piece URL not found

183 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.98%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

127174

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03300709

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

193.06 TiB

Total Deal Size

12.64%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

29998

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03325538

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

134.06 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.78%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

117174

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03358608

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

376.03 TiB

Total Deal Size

24.62%

Deal Percentage

0.01% / 32 GiB

Duplication

221502

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
2 issues
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
5
5.59 TiB
27.97 TiB
1.83%
1
28.53 TiB
28.53 TiB
1.86%
4
46.97 TiB
187.88 TiB
12.3%
6
29.63 TiB
177.75 TiB
11.64%
7
79.19 TiB
554.31 TiB
36.3%
3
12.78 TiB
38.34 TiB
2.51%
2
178.59 TiB
357.19 TiB
23.39%
8
19.38 TiB
155.06 TiB
10.15%
400.66 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.