Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

NanHu

Client ID: f03285082

GitHubView application on GitHubPulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

0 B

Allocated DataCap

2 PiB
Report Detail
Report 36254 from 2025-04-18 04:27

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
4 issues
Number of providers: 20
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
f01313
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
159.53 TiB
3.70%
0.00%
Yes(715 claims)
125052
44.22%
0.00%
f01431043
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
99.41 TiB
2.31%
0.00%
Yes(38 claims)
32502
49.62%
0.00%
f01660795
Jiangmen, Guangdong, CN
68.78 TiB
1.60%
0.00%
Yes(87 claims)
144395
16.77%
0.00%
f01730296
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
9.75 TiB
0.23%
0.00%
Yes(333 claims)
5167
27.41%
0.00%
f02828242
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
319.72 TiB
7.42%
0.00%
Yes(77 claims)
96331
40.98%
0.00%
f03088052
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
37.34 TiB
0.87%
0.00%
Yes(66 claims)
311279
43.37%
0.00%
f03099981
Beijing, Beijing, CN
472.41 TiB
10.97%
0.00%
Yes(44 claims)
187399
46.73%
0.00%
f03099987
Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH
335.63 TiB
7.79%
0.00%
Yes(44 claims)
126762
45.48%
0.00%
f03156722
Harmony Garden, Eastern, HK
199.81 TiB
4.64%
0.00%
Yes(22 claims)
111020
43.63%
0.00%
f03241837
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
10 TiB
0.23%
0.00%
Yes(126 claims)
219936
38.33%
0.00%
f03242023
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
12.38 TiB
0.29%
0.00%
Yes(11 claims)
31385
42.47%
0.00%
f03251993
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
375.03 TiB
8.71%
0.00%
Yes(56 claims)
73176
37.70%
0.00%
f03300709
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
150.75 TiB
3.50%
0.00%
Yes(570 claims)
28393
40.97%
0.00%
f03321072
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
247.25 TiB
5.74%
0.00%
Yes(299 claims)
55279
22.64%
0.00%
f03325538
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
299.16 TiB
6.95%
0.00%
Yes(110 claims)
116927
0.00%
0.00%
f03408862
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
682.09 TiB
15.84%
1.26%
Yes(209 claims)
138715
31.33%
0.00%
f03499694
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
78.91 TiB
1.83%
0.00%
Yes(114 claims)
32239
37.78%
0.00%
f03510628
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
298.66 TiB
6.93%
0.00%
Yes(99 claims)
67451
43.52%
0.00%
f03526300
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
15.66 TiB
0.36%
0.00%
Not reporting
919
0.00%
0.00%
f03529375
Oak Bay, British Columbia, CA
435.09 TiB
10.10%
0.00%
Yes(91 claims)
32456
46.93%
0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
Healthy
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
90.47 TiB
90.47 TiB
2.1%
2
41.63 TiB
83.25 TiB
1.93%
3
154.81 TiB
464.47 TiB
10.78%
4
28.25 TiB
113 TiB
2.62%
5
24.44 TiB
122.31 TiB
2.83%
6
15.09 TiB
93.66 TiB
2.17%
7
34.25 TiB
245.09 TiB
5.69%
8
29 TiB
232 TiB
5.38%
9
37.03 TiB
333.28 TiB
7.73%
10
54.66 TiB
546.56 TiB
12.68%
11
64.22 TiB
706.44 TiB
16.4%
12
62.19 TiB
746.25 TiB
17.32%
13
40.81 TiB
530.56 TiB
12.31%
676.84 TiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
No results.