Allocators

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability
f02808877	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	637.16 TiB	12.77%	0.02%	OK	125648	0.00%	0.00%
f02808899	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	725.75 TiB	14.54%	12.02%	OK	131796	26.57%	0.00%
f03175111	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	608.34 TiB	12.19%	0.33%	OK	133481	31.79%	0.00%
f03175168	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	627.63 TiB	12.58%	0.03%	OK	132566	14.11%	0.00%
f03226666	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	636.34 TiB	12.75%	0.00%	OK	127083	30.99%	0.00%
f03226668	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	637.28 TiB	12.77%	0.07%	OK	127847	25.25%	0.00%
f03253497	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	499.16 TiB	10.00%	0.03%	OK	84252	0.00%	0.00%
f03253580	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	494.22 TiB	9.90%	0.01%	OK	125047	0.00%	0.00%
f03299999	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	124.91 TiB	2.50%	0.00%	OK	68023	34.60%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

Healthy

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	1.88 TiB	1.88 TiB	0.03%
2	256 GiB	512 GiB	0.01%
3	2.78 TiB	8.34 TiB	0.16%
4	8.03 TiB	32.25 TiB	0.64%
5	19.97 TiB	106.81 TiB	2.14%
6	137.47 TiB	906.38 TiB	18.16%
7	74 TiB	518.06 TiB	10.38%
8	308.72 TiB	2.41 PiB	49.5%
9	105.03 TiB	945.94 TiB	18.95%
	658.13 TiB Total

Low provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.