f0101020
Zhengzhou, Henan, CN
2.8 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.85%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
22419
Total Claims
96%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
100.42 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last month or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Zhengzhou, Henan, CN
2.8 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.85%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
22419
Total Claims
96%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Beijing, Beijing, CN
2.48 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.84%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
22900
Total Claims
94%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Zhengzhou, Henan, CN
2.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.99%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
22694
Total Claims
58%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Columbus, Ohio, US
2.3 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.27%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
22826
Total Claims
93%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ashburn, Virginia, US
Sample Piece URL not found
2.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.5%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
39429
Total Claims
89%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
7.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
22.29%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
46864
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Columbus, Ohio, US
2.2 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.95%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
37512
Total Claims
81%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Zhengzhou, Henan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
2.55 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.04%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
37141
Total Claims
95%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ashburn, Virginia, US
2.49 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.87%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
22794
Total Claims
48%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
2.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.41%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
37492
Total Claims
92%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ashburn, Virginia, US
2.21 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.98%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
37422
Total Claims
98%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3.66 TiB | 7.33 TiB | 23.86% |
| 4 | 112 GiB | 448 GiB | 1.42% |
| 3 | 976 GiB | 2.86 TiB | 9.31% |
| 1 | 20.08 TiB | 20.08 TiB | 65.39% |
| 24.8 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.