f0101020
Zhengzhou, Henan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
162.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.33%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
14356
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
N/A
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last month or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Zhengzhou, Henan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
162.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.33%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
14356
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Beijing, Beijing, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
163.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.4%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
14440
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Zhengzhou, Henan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
164.14 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.41%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
14430
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Columbus, Ohio, US
Sample Piece URL not found
164.12 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.41%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
14434
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ashburn, Virginia, US
Sample Piece URL not found
124.05 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.63%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
30773
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Columbus, Ohio, US
Sample Piece URL not found
124.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.63%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
28846
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Zhengzhou, Henan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
123.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.56%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
28596
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ashburn, Virginia, US
Sample Piece URL not found
164.21 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.42%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
14430
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
123.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.58%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
28940
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ashburn, Virginia, US
Sample Piece URL not found
123.98 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.62%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
28900
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 688 GiB | 1.34 TiB | 0.09% |
| 4 | 4.33 TiB | 17.31 TiB | 1.2% |
| 5 | 283.05 TiB | 1.38 PiB | 98.41% |
| 3 | 1.12 TiB | 3.35 TiB | 0.23% |
| 1 | 848 GiB | 848 GiB | 0.05% |
| 289.99 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| f03337791 | 3.84 TiB | 82 |