DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 192929

Client ID: f03252957

Report Detail
Report 192929 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

0.12 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
6 issues
Number of providers: 8

f01660795

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

68 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.43%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

164687

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01975299

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

75 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.89%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

27472

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02816097

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

155.56 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.14%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

83121

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02826007

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

186.84 TiB

Total Deal Size

12.18%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

86505

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02827996

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

282.28 TiB

Total Deal Size

18.41%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

111740

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03156722

Central, Central and Western, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

183 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.93%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

113427

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03231666

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

341.25 TiB

Total Deal Size

22.25%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

130167

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03241837

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

241.59 TiB

Total Deal Size

15.75%

Deal Percentage

0.89% / 2.16 TiB

Duplication

221695

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
Healthy
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
4
5.03 TiB
20.13 TiB
1.31%
5
27.66 TiB
138.28 TiB
9.01%
1
133.41 TiB
133.41 TiB
8.69%
2
44.91 TiB
89.81 TiB
5.85%
3
51.72 TiB
155.53 TiB
10.14%
6
88.44 TiB
531.88 TiB
34.68%
7
66.28 TiB
464.5 TiB
30.28%
417.44 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.