f01084413
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
118.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.84%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
260328
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
N/A
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Activity status not available
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
118.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.84%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
260328
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Jiangmen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
45.28 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.23%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
144395
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
66.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.3%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
85706
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
157.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.76%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
111422
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Changsha, Hunan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
28 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.38%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
27220
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
224.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.09%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
130156
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
103.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.11%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
111020
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
140.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.94%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
121938
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
158 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.79%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
118623
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
254.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.57%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
129147
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
68 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.35%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
80232
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
427.22 TiB
Total Deal Size
21.07%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
220869
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
234.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.54%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
31385
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 30.13 TiB | 271.13 TiB | 13.37% |
| 13 | 21.28 TiB | 276.66 TiB | 13.64% |
| 6 | 22.47 TiB | 134.81 TiB | 6.64% |
| 12 | 22.53 TiB | 270.38 TiB | 13.33% |
| 4 | 61.13 TiB | 244.5 TiB | 12.05% |
| 2 | 22 TiB | 44 TiB | 2.17% |
| 5 | 8.91 TiB | 44.53 TiB | 2.19% |
| 3 | 6.78 TiB | 20.34 TiB | 1% |
| 8 | 14.5 TiB | 116 TiB | 5.72% |
| 7 | 18.22 TiB | 127.53 TiB | 6.29% |
| 10 | 5.69 TiB | 56.88 TiB | 2.8% |
| 11 | 22.66 TiB | 249.22 TiB | 12.29% |
| 1 | 171.44 TiB | 171.44 TiB | 8.45% |
| 427.72 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||