f01084413
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
117.41 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.82%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
259022
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
N/A
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Activity status not available
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
117.41 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.82%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
259022
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Jiangmen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
45.28 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.24%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
144395
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
66.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.31%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
85705
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
157.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.8%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
111421
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Changsha, Hunan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
28 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.39%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
27082
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
224.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.14%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
130156
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Harmony Garden, Eastern, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
103.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.14%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
111020
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
138.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.84%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
121040
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
156.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.78%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
117545
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
254.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.63%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
129146
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
66.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.31%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
79405
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
424.22 TiB
Total Deal Size
21.02%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
219936
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
234.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.6%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
31385
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 29.53 TiB | 265.78 TiB | 13.16% |
| 13 | 19.78 TiB | 257.16 TiB | 12.74% |
| 6 | 22.5 TiB | 135 TiB | 6.68% |
| 12 | 22.81 TiB | 273.75 TiB | 13.56% |
| 4 | 59.34 TiB | 237.38 TiB | 11.76% |
| 2 | 22 TiB | 44 TiB | 2.17% |
| 5 | 9.59 TiB | 47.97 TiB | 2.37% |
| 3 | 8.56 TiB | 25.69 TiB | 1.27% |
| 8 | 14.16 TiB | 113.25 TiB | 5.61% |
| 7 | 18.38 TiB | 128.63 TiB | 6.37% |
| 10 | 6.19 TiB | 61.88 TiB | 3.06% |
| 11 | 23.31 TiB | 256.44 TiB | 12.7% |
| 1 | 171.56 TiB | 171.56 TiB | 8.49% |
| 427.72 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||