DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 106044

Client ID: f03244944

Report Detail
Report 106044 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

1.27 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last month or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
5 issues
Number of providers: 10

f0109903

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

19.38 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.44%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

6434

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01975299

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

147.88 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.03%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

27455

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02029742

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

255.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

19.09%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

130810

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02816097

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

149.16 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.12%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

83032

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03066836

Changsha, Hunan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

26.34 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.96%

Deal Percentage

1.3% / 352 GiB

Duplication

27386

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03192503

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

120.38 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.98%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

66808

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03214920

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

150.94 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.26%

Deal Percentage

0.91% / 1.38 TiB

Duplication

122398

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03526300

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

97.84 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.3%

Deal Percentage

6.96% / 6.81 TiB

Duplication

15925

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03612600

Xining, Qinghai, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

264.25 TiB

Total Deal Size

19.71%

Deal Percentage

0.02% / 64 GiB

Duplication

65688

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03614397

Xining, Qinghai, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

108.88 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.12%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

131095

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
2 issues
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
5
16.69 TiB
83.47 TiB
6.22%
6
45.25 TiB
272.16 TiB
20.29%
3
480 GiB
1.44 TiB
0.1%
2
105.19 TiB
210.38 TiB
15.68%
7
44.72 TiB
314.19 TiB
23.42%
4
24.72 TiB
99.03 TiB
7.38%
1
207.28 TiB
207.31 TiB
15.45%
8
18.31 TiB
153.03 TiB
11.41%
462.63 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.