DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 319760

Client ID: f03241703

Report Detail
Report 319760 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

0.84 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
6 issues
Number of providers: 10

f01084413

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

150.81 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.51%

Deal Percentage

0.75% / 1.13 TiB

Duplication

261713

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01431043

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

146 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.23%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

32765

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02826007

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

267.75 TiB

Total Deal Size

15.1%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

86505

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02827996

Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

369.59 TiB

Total Deal Size

20.85%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

111740

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03066836

Changsha, Hunan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

86.47 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.88%

Deal Percentage

0.65% / 576 GiB

Duplication

27388

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03088052

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

132.81 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.49%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

319116

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03100009

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

195.88 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.05%

Deal Percentage

0.96% / 1.88 TiB

Duplication

302796

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03156722

The Peak, Central and Western, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

185.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.49%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

113400

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03228358

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

131.63 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.42%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

119916

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f0671982

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

106.13 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.99%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

3834

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
8
46 TiB
369 TiB
20.81%
9
72.69 TiB
654.69 TiB
36.92%
3
8.72 TiB
26.66 TiB
1.5%
7
16.47 TiB
115.47 TiB
6.51%
6
10.31 TiB
61.88 TiB
3.48%
2
84.06 TiB
168.13 TiB
9.48%
1
212.25 TiB
212.25 TiB
11.97%
4
35.31 TiB
142.63 TiB
8.04%
5
4.47 TiB
22.34 TiB
1.26%
490.28 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.