DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 133969

Client ID: f03240472

Report Detail
Report 133969 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

0.83 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
6 issues
Number of providers: 21

f01084413

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

164.84 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.24%

Deal Percentage

0.3% / 512 GiB

Duplication

261686

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01313

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

100.06 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.36%

Deal Percentage

0.06% / 64 GiB

Duplication

132537

Total Claims

0%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01431043

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

1 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.01%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

32749

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01660795

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

340.13 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.62%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

144834

Total Claims

0%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02816097

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

162.16 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.2%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

83032

Total Claims

0%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02851143

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

357.66 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.86%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

28229

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03066836

Changsha, Hunan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

48.78 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.66%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

27386

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03099981

Beijing, Beijing, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

686.53 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.32%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

192890

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03099987

Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH

Sample Piece URL not found

1.43 PiB

Total Deal Size

19.86%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

127139

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03100004

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

145.13 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.97%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

131432

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03100009

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

202.66 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.75%

Deal Percentage

0.62% / 1.25 TiB

Duplication

302729

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03228358

Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

174.5 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.37%

Deal Percentage

0.57% / 1 TiB

Duplication

119905

Total Claims

0%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03231666

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

245.19 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.33%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

130050

Total Claims

0%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03233333

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

299.44 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.07%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

128876

Total Claims

0%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03233966

Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

81.09 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.1%

Deal Percentage

2.47% / 2 TiB

Duplication

81197

Total Claims

0%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03251993

Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

788.56 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.71%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

73176

Total Claims

0%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03321072

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

4.13 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.06%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

75037

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03325538

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

491.91 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.68%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

117100

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03358608

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

299.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.07%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

220891

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03510628

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

1.08 PiB

Total Deal Size

15.07%

Deal Percentage

0.01% / 128 GiB

Duplication

122991

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03529375

Vancouver, British Columbia, CA

Sample Piece URL not found

199.03 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.7%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

83006

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
10
15.66 TiB
156.56 TiB
2.12%
15
26.16 TiB
392.84 TiB
5.33%
9
83.59 TiB
752.34 TiB
10.21%
16
39.91 TiB
639.84 TiB
8.68%
5
70.78 TiB
353.91 TiB
4.8%
20
1 TiB
20.25 TiB
0.27%
6
74.78 TiB
448.72 TiB
6.09%
14
8.53 TiB
119.56 TiB
1.62%
1
359.56 TiB
359.56 TiB
4.88%
4
195.25 TiB
781.03 TiB
10.6%
13
5.75 TiB
74.81 TiB
1.01%
8
3.75 TiB
30 TiB
0.4%
11
2.34 TiB
25.78 TiB
0.35%
19
9.44 TiB
180.03 TiB
2.44%
7
45.75 TiB
320.25 TiB
4.34%
18
63.38 TiB
1.12 PiB
15.5%
12
17.16 TiB
205.88 TiB
2.79%
2
320.88 TiB
641.81 TiB
8.71%
17
24.41 TiB
415.38 TiB
5.63%
3
101.66 TiB
304.97 TiB
4.14%
1.44 PiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.