f0114153
Changsha, Hunan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
286.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.67%
Deal Percentage
0.56% / 1.59 TiB
Duplication
259986
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
1.06 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Changsha, Hunan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
286.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.67%
Deal Percentage
0.56% / 1.59 TiB
Duplication
259986
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
243.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.05%
Deal Percentage
1.05% / 2.56 TiB
Duplication
26047
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
411.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
15.32%
Deal Percentage
0.96% / 3.97 TiB
Duplication
143917
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
170.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.35%
Deal Percentage
1.79% / 3.06 TiB
Duplication
302796
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US
Sample Piece URL not found
25.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.95%
Deal Percentage
2.2% / 576 GiB
Duplication
197683
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
65.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.45%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
67138
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
474.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
17.66%
Deal Percentage
8.29% / 39.34 TiB
Duplication
143532
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US
Sample Piece URL not found
463.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
17.23%
Deal Percentage
5.67% / 26.28 TiB
Duplication
170580
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
New York City, New York, US
Sample Piece URL not found
215.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.03%
Deal Percentage
0.55% / 1.19 TiB
Duplication
153786
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US
Sample Piece URL not found
60.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.26%
Deal Percentage
0.15% / 96 GiB
Duplication
93613
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
209.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.78%
Deal Percentage
0.54% / 1.13 TiB
Duplication
122404
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
London, England, GB
Sample Piece URL not found
60.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.25%
Deal Percentage
0.21% / 128 GiB
Duplication
76582
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | 36.13 TiB | 409.56 TiB | 15.23% |
| 7 | 40.22 TiB | 294.59 TiB | 10.95% |
| 9 | 3.78 TiB | 35.69 TiB | 1.32% |
| 2 | 29.78 TiB | 59.56 TiB | 2.21% |
| 5 | 24.13 TiB | 124.84 TiB | 4.64% |
| 1 | 1.66 TiB | 1.66 TiB | 0.06% |
| 3 | 123.81 TiB | 372.5 TiB | 13.85% |
| 6 | 11.25 TiB | 69.81 TiB | 2.59% |
| 12 | 23.69 TiB | 288.5 TiB | 10.73% |
| 4 | 43.19 TiB | 175.91 TiB | 6.54% |
| 10 | 2.41 TiB | 25.06 TiB | 0.93% |
| 8 | 99.22 TiB | 830.75 TiB | 30.9% |
| 439.25 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||