f02825282
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
60 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.05%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
113322
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
4.72 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
60 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.05%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
113322
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
144.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
17%
Deal Percentage
43.11% / 62.34 TiB
Duplication
115620
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
59.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.01%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
116516
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
120.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
14.11%
Deal Percentage
43.58% / 52.31 TiB
Duplication
113584
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
12 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.41%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
210782
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
79.28 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.32%
Deal Percentage
1.97% / 1.56 TiB
Duplication
93759
Total Claims
12%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
77.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.16%
Deal Percentage
1.24% / 992 GiB
Duplication
82083
Total Claims
9%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
37 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.35%
Deal Percentage
0.08% / 32 GiB
Duplication
68376
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
129.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
15.25%
Deal Percentage
0.24% / 320 GiB
Duplication
46139
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
130.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
15.35%
Deal Percentage
1.17% / 1.53 TiB
Duplication
108874
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 31.06 TiB | 96.47 TiB | 11.33% |
| 5 | 9.22 TiB | 57.34 TiB | 6.73% |
| 1 | 4.06 TiB | 4.16 TiB | 0.48% |
| 2 | 129.25 TiB | 262.72 TiB | 30.87% |
| 6 | 25.78 TiB | 205.44 TiB | 24.14% |
| 7 | 14.66 TiB | 122.88 TiB | 14.43% |
| 4 | 18.19 TiB | 101.94 TiB | 11.97% |
| 232.22 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| f03137626 | 3.56 TiB | 24 |