f01025366
Qingdao, Shandong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
693 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.9%
Deal Percentage
0.18% / 1.25 TiB
Duplication
114256
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
1.08 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Qingdao, Shandong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
693 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.9%
Deal Percentage
0.18% / 1.25 TiB
Duplication
114256
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Qingdao, Shandong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
1 PiB
Total Deal Size
13.18%
Deal Percentage
0.25% / 2.56 TiB
Duplication
72661
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
914.28 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.74%
Deal Percentage
1.32% / 12.09 TiB
Duplication
206382
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
30.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.39%
Deal Percentage
9.61% / 2.91 TiB
Duplication
45051
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
222.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.86%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
115972
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
283.84 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.64%
Deal Percentage
0.95% / 2.69 TiB
Duplication
57693
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
560.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.2%
Deal Percentage
1.51% / 8.44 TiB
Duplication
42534
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
858.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.02%
Deal Percentage
0.03% / 256 GiB
Duplication
137671
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
226 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.9%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 32 GiB
Duplication
57257
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
1.08 PiB
Total Deal Size
14.26%
Deal Percentage
7.8% / 86.66 TiB
Duplication
38703
Total Claims
0%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
860.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.05%
Deal Percentage
1.69% / 14.53 TiB
Duplication
30004
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
43.84 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.56%
Deal Percentage
0.93% / 416 GiB
Duplication
63773
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Beijing, Beijing, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
875.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.24%
Deal Percentage
0.21% / 1.84 TiB
Duplication
33123
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
81.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.05%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
71152
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 272.88 TiB | 2.15 PiB | 28.25% |
| 6 | 306.47 TiB | 1.82 PiB | 23.93% |
| 1 | 675.47 TiB | 684.19 TiB | 8.78% |
| 7 | 179.34 TiB | 1.24 PiB | 16.24% |
| 2 | 38.38 TiB | 76.81 TiB | 0.98% |
| 5 | 219.22 TiB | 1.13 PiB | 14.79% |
| 4 | 92.41 TiB | 385.81 TiB | 4.95% |
| 3 | 53.03 TiB | 159.47 TiB | 2.04% |
| 1.79 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||