CommonCrawl

Client ID: f03144229

GitHubView application on GitHub PulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

32 GiB

Allocated DataCap

7.76 TiB

Report Detail

Report 55285 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Activity status not available

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

5 issues

Number of providers: 23

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability	RPA
f0122215	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	1.28 TiB	0.03%	0.00%	OK	72465	83.98%	0.00%	0.00%
f02029742	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	61.31 TiB	1.24%	0.00%	Yes(374 claims)	130596	36.16%	0.00%	0.00%
f03035686	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	10 TiB	0.20%	0.00%	Not reporting	115972	32.30%	0.00%	0.00%
f03088052	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	177.94 TiB	3.59%	0.00%	Yes(66 claims)	312675	42.58%	0.00%	0.00%
f03099981	Beijing, Beijing, CN	326.38 TiB	6.58%	0.00%	Yes(44 claims)	187439	50.70%	0.00%	0.00%
f03099987	Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH	428.97 TiB	8.64%	0.00%	Yes(44 claims)	126762	49.56%	0.00%	0.00%
f03136267	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	15.16 TiB	0.31%	0.00%	Not reporting	47181	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03144077	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	20 TiB	0.40%	0.00%	Not reporting	38991	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03157905	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	141.91 TiB	2.86%	0.00%	OK	136996	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03157910	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	38.13 TiB	0.77%	0.08%	OK	57106	47.34%	0.00%	0.00%
f03162991	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	28.59 TiB	0.58%	0.00%	OK	36202	87.05%	0.00%	0.00%
f03202108	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	53.22 TiB	1.07%	2.47%	OK	98665	98.52%	98.52%	0.00%
f03215853	Portland, Oregon, US	43.41 TiB	0.87%	1.15%	Not reporting	121606	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03218576	Portland, Oregon, US	37.72 TiB	0.76%	0.83%	Not reporting	124946	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03220172	Singapore, Singapore, SG	895.44 TiB	18.04%	0.00%	OK	118423	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03231154	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	104.03 TiB	2.10%	0.00%	OK	70172	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03233333	Jiangmen, Guangdong, CN	140.88 TiB	2.84%	0.00%	Yes(750 claims)	127833	21.13%	0.00%	0.00%
f03252730	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	214.13 TiB	4.31%	0.00%	OK	59626	69.48%	69.48%	0.00%
f03260592	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	973.09 TiB	19.61%	7.53%	OK	45869	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03291373	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	63.13 TiB	1.27%	0.00%	Not reporting	5621	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03333933	Ningbo, Zhejiang, CN	37.47 TiB	0.76%	0.83%	OK	28912	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03358608	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	397.78 TiB	8.02%	0.00%	Yes(242 claims)	217292	9.39%	0.00%	0.00%
f03363420	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	752.56 TiB	15.16%	0.00%	OK	82629	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

1 issue

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	591.69 TiB	591.69 TiB	11.92%
2	499.16 TiB	998.41 TiB	20.11%
3	112.78 TiB	338.75 TiB	6.82%
4	142.63 TiB	576.91 TiB	11.62%
5	160.72 TiB	870.34 TiB	17.53%
6	55.09 TiB	330.88 TiB	6.66%
7	116.44 TiB	815.75 TiB	16.43%
8	53.53 TiB	429.28 TiB	8.65%
9	1.16 TiB	10.5 TiB	0.21%
	1.69 PiB Total

Wrong provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.

Propose a Dashboard