Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

CommonCrawl

Client ID: f03144229

GitHubView application on GitHubPulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

32 GiB

Allocated DataCap

7.76 TiB
Report Detail
Report 41892 from 2025-05-10 03:21

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
4 issues
Number of providers: 23
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
f0122215
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
1.28 TiB
0.03%
0.00%
OK
72465
22.30%
0.00%
f02029742
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
61.31 TiB
1.24%
0.00%
Yes(132 claims)
52225
0.00%
0.00%
f03035686
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
10 TiB
0.20%
0.00%
Not reporting
115972
0.00%
0.00%
f03088052
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
177.94 TiB
3.59%
0.00%
Yes(66 claims)
311279
0.00%
0.00%
f03099981
Beijing, Beijing, CN
326.38 TiB
6.58%
0.00%
Yes(44 claims)
187399
0.00%
0.00%
f03099987
Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH
428.97 TiB
8.65%
0.00%
Yes(44 claims)
126762
0.00%
0.00%
f03136267
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
15.16 TiB
0.31%
0.00%
Not reporting
47181
0.00%
0.00%
f03144077
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
20 TiB
0.40%
0.00%
Not reporting
38991
0.00%
0.00%
f03157905
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
141.91 TiB
2.86%
0.00%
OK
136995
0.00%
0.00%
f03157910
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
38.09 TiB
0.77%
0.00%
OK
57105
0.00%
0.00%
f03162991
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
28.59 TiB
0.58%
0.00%
OK
36202
61.28%
0.00%
f03202108
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
51.91 TiB
1.05%
0.00%
OK
98131
0.00%
0.00%
f03215853
Portland, Oregon, US
42.91 TiB
0.87%
0.00%
Not reporting
120201
0.00%
0.00%
f03218576
Portland, Oregon, US
37.41 TiB
0.75%
0.00%
Not reporting
123615
0.00%
0.00%
f03220172
Singapore, Singapore, SG
895.44 TiB
18.05%
0.00%
OK
118422
0.00%
0.00%
f03231154
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
104.03 TiB
2.10%
0.00%
OK
70172
28.97%
0.00%
f03233333
Jiangmen, Guangdong, CN
140.88 TiB
2.84%
0.00%
Yes(672 claims)
104740
0.00%
0.00%
f03252730
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
214.13 TiB
4.32%
0.00%
OK
58276
0.00%
0.00%
f03260592
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
972.81 TiB
19.61%
7.54%
OK
41549
0.00%
0.00%
f03291373
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
63.13 TiB
1.27%
0.00%
Not reporting
5621
0.00%
0.00%
f03333933
Ningbo, Zhejiang, CN
37.47 TiB
0.76%
0.83%
OK
28910
0.00%
0.00%
f03358608
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
397.78 TiB
8.02%
0.00%
Yes(209 claims)
195890
0.00%
0.00%
f03363420
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
752.44 TiB
15.17%
0.00%
OK
78429
0.00%
0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
591.56 TiB
591.56 TiB
11.92%
2
499.16 TiB
998.41 TiB
20.12%
3
112.78 TiB
338.75 TiB
6.82%
4
142.63 TiB
576.88 TiB
11.63%
5
160.78 TiB
870.63 TiB
17.55%
6
55.25 TiB
331.5 TiB
6.68%
7
116.22 TiB
813.56 TiB
16.4%
8
53.53 TiB
428.25 TiB
8.63%
9
1.16 TiB
10.41 TiB
0.2%
1.69 PiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
No results.