Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

CommonCrawl

Client ID: f03144229

GitHubView application on GitHubPulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

32 GiB

Allocated DataCap

7.76 TiB
Report Detail
Report 14040 from 2025-02-15 03:36

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
4 issues
Number of providers: 23
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
f0122215
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
1.28 TiB
0.03%
0.00%
OK
32691
83.48%
0.00%
f02029742
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
61.31 TiB
1.33%
0.00%
Not reporting
28385
92.35%
0.00%
f03035686
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
10 TiB
0.22%
0.00%
Not reporting
115972
28.23%
0.00%
f03088052
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
177.94 TiB
3.85%
0.00%
Yes(11 claims)
311279
48.05%
0.00%
f03099981
Beijing, Beijing, CN
326.38 TiB
7.06%
0.00%
Yes(165 claims)
161134
93.73%
0.00%
f03099987
Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH
428.97 TiB
9.28%
0.00%
Yes(11 claims)
126762
95.17%
0.00%
f03136267
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
15.16 TiB
0.33%
0.00%
Not reporting
47181
0.00%
0.00%
f03144077
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
20 TiB
0.43%
0.00%
Not reporting
38991
0.00%
0.00%
f03157905
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
141.91 TiB
3.07%
0.00%
OK
136995
26.08%
0.00%
f03157910
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
38.09 TiB
0.82%
0.00%
OK
57105
49.19%
0.00%
f03162991
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
28.59 TiB
0.62%
0.00%
OK
36202
82.93%
0.00%
f03202108
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
51.91 TiB
1.12%
0.00%
OK
98129
94.47%
0.00%
f03215853
Portland, Oregon, US
42.91 TiB
0.93%
0.00%
Not reporting
120201
0.42%
0.00%
f03218576
Portland, Oregon, US
37.41 TiB
0.81%
0.00%
Yes(39564 claims)
123615
0.00%
0.00%
f03220172
Singapore, Singapore, SG
895.44 TiB
19.37%
0.00%
OK
118422
45.74%
0.00%
f03231154
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
104.03 TiB
2.25%
0.00%
OK
61916
67.57%
0.00%
f03233333
Jiangmen, Guangdong, CN
122.25 TiB
2.64%
0.00%
Yes(165 claims)
36299
91.52%
0.00%
f03252730
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
214.13 TiB
4.63%
0.00%
OK
45451
82.55%
0.00%
f03260592
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
972.81 TiB
21.05%
7.54%
OK
40605
86.31%
0.00%
f03291373
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
63.13 TiB
1.37%
0.00%
Not reporting
5621
0.00%
0.00%
f03333933
Ningbo, Zhejiang, CN
37.47 TiB
0.81%
0.83%
OK
15225
57.92%
0.00%
f03358608
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
397.78 TiB
8.61%
0.00%
Yes(89 claims)
45661
82.61%
0.00%
f03363420
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
433.59 TiB
9.38%
0.00%
OK
13875
96.24%
0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
271.16 TiB
271.16 TiB
5.87%
2
498.66 TiB
997.41 TiB
21.59%
3
112.78 TiB
338.75 TiB
7.33%
4
142.63 TiB
576.88 TiB
12.49%
5
161.94 TiB
876.41 TiB
18.97%
6
72.78 TiB
436.69 TiB
9.45%
7
97.53 TiB
682.75 TiB
14.78%
8
53.53 TiB
428.25 TiB
9.27%
9
1.16 TiB
10.41 TiB
0.22%
1.38 PiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
No results.