Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

CommonCrawl

Client ID: f03144229

GitHubView application on GitHubPulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

32 GiB

Allocated DataCap

7.76 TiB
Report Detail
Report 13373 from 2025-02-13 03:34

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
4 issues
Number of providers: 23
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
f0122215
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
1.28 TiB
0.03%
0.00%
OK
32691
86.43%
0.00%
f02029742
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
61.31 TiB
1.42%
0.00%
Not reporting
28385
93.65%
0.00%
f03035686
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
10 TiB
0.23%
0.00%
Not reporting
115972
27.22%
0.00%
f03088052
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
177.94 TiB
4.12%
0.00%
Yes(11 claims)
311279
73.85%
0.00%
f03099981
Beijing, Beijing, CN
198.13 TiB
4.59%
0.00%
Yes(143 claims)
153866
95.29%
0.00%
f03099987
Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH
428.97 TiB
9.94%
0.00%
Yes(11 claims)
126762
95.76%
0.00%
f03136267
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
15.16 TiB
0.35%
0.00%
Not reporting
47181
0.00%
0.00%
f03144077
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
20 TiB
0.46%
0.00%
Not reporting
38991
0.00%
0.00%
f03157905
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
141.91 TiB
3.29%
0.00%
OK
136995
26.83%
0.00%
f03157910
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
38.09 TiB
0.88%
0.00%
OK
57105
49.93%
0.00%
f03162991
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
28.59 TiB
0.66%
0.00%
OK
36202
84.14%
0.00%
f03202108
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
51.91 TiB
1.20%
0.00%
OK
98129
95.74%
0.00%
f03215853
Portland, Oregon, US
42.91 TiB
0.99%
0.00%
Not reporting
120201
4.17%
0.00%
f03218576
Portland, Oregon, US
37.41 TiB
0.87%
0.00%
Yes(39564 claims)
123615
0.00%
0.00%
f03220172
Singapore, Singapore, SG
895.44 TiB
20.75%
0.00%
OK
118422
43.92%
0.00%
f03231154
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
104.03 TiB
2.41%
0.00%
OK
59900
66.77%
0.00%
f03233333
Jiangmen, Guangdong, CN
50.75 TiB
1.18%
0.00%
Yes(154 claims)
34006
93.22%
0.00%
f03252730
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
214.13 TiB
4.96%
0.00%
OK
45451
83.61%
0.00%
f03260592
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
972.81 TiB
22.54%
7.54%
OK
40605
85.21%
0.00%
f03291373
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
63.13 TiB
1.46%
0.00%
Not reporting
5621
0.00%
0.00%
f03333933
Ningbo, Zhejiang, CN
37.47 TiB
0.87%
0.83%
OK
13285
28.34%
0.00%
f03358608
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
395.09 TiB
9.15%
0.00%
Yes(67 claims)
43536
85.91%
0.00%
f03363420
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
329.88 TiB
7.64%
0.00%
OK
10556
96.09%
0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
260.16 TiB
260.16 TiB
6.05%
2
510.44 TiB
1020.97 TiB
23.74%
3
153.06 TiB
459.59 TiB
10.68%
4
104.38 TiB
423.88 TiB
9.85%
5
124.56 TiB
689.53 TiB
16.03%
6
122.84 TiB
737.06 TiB
17.14%
7
47.72 TiB
334.06 TiB
7.76%
8
45.53 TiB
364.25 TiB
8.47%
9
1.16 TiB
10.41 TiB
0.24%
1.34 PiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
No results.