Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

CommonCrawl

Client ID: f03144229

GitHubView application on GitHubPulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

32 GiB

Allocated DataCap

7.76 TiB
Report Detail
Report 13042 from 2025-02-12 03:34

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
4 issues
Number of providers: 22
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
f0122215
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
1.28 TiB
0.03%
0.00%
OK
32691
86.23%
0.00%
f02029742
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
61.31 TiB
1.56%
0.00%
Not reporting
28385
93.41%
0.00%
f03035686
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
10 TiB
0.25%
0.00%
Not reporting
115972
29.83%
0.00%
f03088052
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
177.94 TiB
4.53%
0.00%
Yes(11 claims)
311279
86.94%
0.00%
f03099981
Beijing, Beijing, CN
126.91 TiB
3.23%
0.00%
Yes(132 claims)
151542
95.43%
0.00%
f03099987
Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH
428.97 TiB
10.92%
0.00%
Yes(11 claims)
126762
95.75%
0.00%
f03136267
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
15.16 TiB
0.39%
0.00%
Not reporting
47181
0.00%
0.00%
f03144077
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
20 TiB
0.51%
0.00%
Not reporting
38991
0.00%
0.00%
f03157905
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
141.91 TiB
3.61%
0.00%
OK
136995
27.45%
0.00%
f03157910
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
38.09 TiB
0.97%
0.00%
OK
57105
49.42%
0.00%
f03162991
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
28.59 TiB
0.73%
0.00%
OK
36202
85.51%
0.00%
f03202108
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
51.91 TiB
1.32%
0.00%
OK
98129
95.87%
0.00%
f03215853
Portland, Oregon, US
42.91 TiB
1.09%
0.00%
Not reporting
120201
5.76%
0.00%
f03218576
Portland, Oregon, US
37.41 TiB
0.95%
0.00%
Yes(39564 claims)
123615
0.00%
0.00%
f03220172
Singapore, Singapore, SG
895.44 TiB
22.78%
0.00%
OK
118422
43.08%
0.00%
f03231154
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
104.03 TiB
2.65%
0.00%
OK
58668
64.97%
0.00%
f03252730
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
214.13 TiB
5.45%
0.00%
OK
45451
84.97%
0.00%
f03260592
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
972.81 TiB
24.75%
7.54%
OK
40605
85.37%
0.00%
f03291373
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
63.13 TiB
1.61%
0.00%
Not reporting
5621
0.00%
0.00%
f03333933
Ningbo, Zhejiang, CN
37.47 TiB
0.95%
0.83%
OK
12594
17.62%
0.00%
f03358608
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
190.22 TiB
4.84%
0.00%
Yes(56 claims)
35458
85.84%
0.00%
f03363420
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
270.38 TiB
6.88%
0.00%
OK
8652
95.76%
0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
363.34 TiB
363.34 TiB
9.27%
2
508.34 TiB
1016.78 TiB
25.94%
3
108.31 TiB
325.34 TiB
8.3%
4
73.69 TiB
301.13 TiB
7.68%
5
145.38 TiB
793.59 TiB
20.24%
6
102.09 TiB
612.56 TiB
15.63%
7
43.06 TiB
301.47 TiB
7.69%
8
24.31 TiB
194.5 TiB
4.96%
9
1.16 TiB
10.41 TiB
0.26%
1.34 PiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
No results.