CommonCrawl

Client ID: f03144229

GitHubView application on GitHub PulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

32 GiB

Allocated DataCap

7.76 TiB

Report Detail

Report 115572 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

2.89 days

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

7 issues

Number of providers: 23

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability	RPA
f0122215	Qingdao, Shandong, CN	1.28 TiB	0.03%	0.00%	OK	72661	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02029742	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	61.31 TiB	1.21%	0.00%	Yes(562 claims)	130810	7.37%	7.37%	0.00%
f03035686	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	10 TiB	0.20%	0.00%	Not reporting	115972	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03088052	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	177.94 TiB	3.52%	0.00%	Yes(66 claims)	312675	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03099981	Beijing, Beijing, CN	367.88 TiB	7.27%	0.00%	Yes(44 claims)	192890	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03099987	Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH	429.31 TiB	8.49%	0.00%	Yes(44 claims)	127139	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03136267	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	15.16 TiB	0.30%	0.00%	Not reporting	47181	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03144077	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	20 TiB	0.40%	0.00%	Not reporting	38991	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03157905	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	141.91 TiB	2.81%	0.00%	OK	137388	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03157910	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	38.13 TiB	0.75%	0.08%	OK	57181	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03162991	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	28.59 TiB	0.57%	0.00%	OK	36202	0.00%	0.00%	2.00%
f03202108	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	53.22 TiB	1.05%	2.47%	OK	98947	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03215853	Portland, Oregon, US	43.41 TiB	0.86%	1.15%	Not reporting	122465	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03218576	Portland, Oregon, US	37.72 TiB	0.75%	0.83%	Not reporting	125395	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03220172	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	897.09 TiB	17.74%	0.00%	OK	118886	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03231154	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	104.03 TiB	2.06%	0.00%	OK	70964	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03233333	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	148.81 TiB	2.94%	0.00%	Yes(970 claims)	128876	3.17%	3.17%	0.00%
f03252730	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	215.53 TiB	4.26%	0.00%	OK	59968	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03260592	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	973.38 TiB	19.25%	7.54%	OK	45878	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03291373	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	63.13 TiB	1.25%	0.00%	Not reporting	5622	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03333933	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	37.5 TiB	0.74%	0.92%	OK	29602	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03358608	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	399.88 TiB	7.91%	0.00%	Yes(253 claims)	220891	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03363420	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	792.34 TiB	15.67%	0.00%	OK	84004	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

2 issues

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	593.63 TiB	593.63 TiB	11.73%
2	492.94 TiB	985.97 TiB	19.49%
3	76.31 TiB	229.38 TiB	4.53%
4	178.19 TiB	718.41 TiB	14.2%
5	166.88 TiB	901.97 TiB	17.83%
6	46.88 TiB	281.59 TiB	5.56%
7	99.13 TiB	694.56 TiB	13.73%
8	80.06 TiB	641.53 TiB	12.68%
9	1.16 TiB	10.5 TiB	0.2%
	1.69 PiB Total

Wrong provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.

Propose a Dashboard