f01926635
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
416.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
18.02%
Deal Percentage
49.4% / 205.97 TiB
Duplication
188780
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
0.14 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last month or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
416.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
18.02%
Deal Percentage
49.4% / 205.97 TiB
Duplication
188780
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
377.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
16.33%
Deal Percentage
49.71% / 187.81 TiB
Duplication
65099
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
185.09 TiB
Total Deal Size
8%
Deal Percentage
0.17% / 320 GiB
Duplication
97989
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
160.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.95%
Deal Percentage
6.22% / 10 TiB
Duplication
100934
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
435.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
18.83%
Deal Percentage
0.07% / 320 GiB
Duplication
109452
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
235.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.17%
Deal Percentage
0.11% / 256 GiB
Duplication
112266
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
14.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.63%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
21649
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
189.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.2%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 32 GiB
Duplication
163841
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
297.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.85%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
177419
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 73.63 TiB | 73.63 TiB | 3.18% |
| 6 | 35.91 TiB | 283.63 TiB | 12.26% |
| 4 | 15.53 TiB | 77.91 TiB | 3.36% |
| 3 | 25.81 TiB | 78.03 TiB | 3.37% |
| 2 | 184.53 TiB | 369.06 TiB | 15.95% |
| 7 | 134.69 TiB | 1.19 PiB | 52.58% |
| 5 | 10.84 TiB | 72.16 TiB | 3.11% |
| 8 | 14.22 TiB | 142.28 TiB | 6.15% |
| 495.16 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||