f02825282
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
244.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.92%
Deal Percentage
23.52% / 57.53 TiB
Duplication
114051
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
7.86 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
244.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.92%
Deal Percentage
23.52% / 57.53 TiB
Duplication
114051
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
908.84 TiB
Total Deal Size
18.26%
Deal Percentage
18.99% / 172.59 TiB
Duplication
120650
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
700.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
14.08%
Deal Percentage
6.18% / 43.31 TiB
Duplication
123876
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
812.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
16.32%
Deal Percentage
8.62% / 70 TiB
Duplication
117716
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
458.28 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.21%
Deal Percentage
6.18% / 28.31 TiB
Duplication
215446
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
1.04 PiB
Total Deal Size
21.41%
Deal Percentage
19.14% / 203.91 TiB
Duplication
122685
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
377.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.58%
Deal Percentage
7.05% / 26.59 TiB
Duplication
93760
Total Claims
58%
RPA
58%
Consistent RPA
42%
Inconsistent RPA
10948 ms
Time to First Byte
8.02 Mbps
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
330.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.64%
Deal Percentage
5.06% / 16.72 TiB
Duplication
82085
Total Claims
70%
RPA
70%
Consistent RPA
30%
Inconsistent RPA
10921 ms
Time to First Byte
5.18 Mbps
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
78.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.58%
Deal Percentage
1.31% / 1.03 TiB
Duplication
108883
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 152.56 TiB | 750.72 TiB | 15.08% |
| 8 | 70.97 TiB | 599.13 TiB | 12.03% |
| 2 | 5.47 TiB | 11.5 TiB | 0.23% |
| 3 | 12.19 TiB | 61.09 TiB | 1.22% |
| 5 | 255.25 TiB | 1.43 PiB | 29.34% |
| 7 | 161.94 TiB | 1.21 PiB | 24.93% |
| 1 | 114.53 TiB | 140.69 TiB | 2.82% |
| 6 | 101.16 TiB | 711.97 TiB | 14.3% |
| 874.06 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| f03173478 | 832 GiB | 24 |