f01222595
Moscow, Moscow, RU
Sample Piece URL not found
64 GiB
Total Deal Size
0%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
23953
Total Claims
100%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
4.93 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Moscow, Moscow, RU
Sample Piece URL not found
64 GiB
Total Deal Size
0%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
23953
Total Claims
100%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Lelystad, Flevoland, NL
Sample Piece URL not found
5.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.24%
Deal Percentage
6.78% / 384 GiB
Duplication
13083
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Lelystad, Flevoland, NL
Sample Piece URL not found
27.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.17%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
5069
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Lelystad, Flevoland, NL
Sample Piece URL not found
6.41 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.28%
Deal Percentage
3.41% / 224 GiB
Duplication
3337
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Sydney, New South Wales, AU
Sample Piece URL not found
603.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
26.09%
Deal Percentage
2.23% / 13.47 TiB
Duplication
30681
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Haskovo, Haskovo, BG
Sample Piece URL not found
92.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.01%
Deal Percentage
6.06% / 5.63 TiB
Duplication
7720
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Austin, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
5.28 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.23%
Deal Percentage
1.18% / 64 GiB
Duplication
35709
Total Claims
6%
RPA
6%
Consistent RPA
94%
Inconsistent RPA
10101 ms
Time to First Byte
442.48 Mbps
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
1.09 PiB
Total Deal Size
48.07%
Deal Percentage
0.73% / 8.16 TiB
Duplication
44547
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Castle Cary, England, GB
255.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.02%
Deal Percentage
4.41% / 11.25 TiB
Duplication
17114
Total Claims
63%
RPA
63%
Consistent RPA
37%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Yaremche, Ivano-Frankivsk, UA
Sample Piece URL not found
205.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.88%
Deal Percentage
0.26% / 544 GiB
Duplication
10601
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 662.97 TiB | 1.31 PiB | 58.14% |
| 5 | 24.84 TiB | 125.28 TiB | 5.41% |
| 4 | 21 TiB | 84.5 TiB | 3.65% |
| 3 | 113.88 TiB | 346.41 TiB | 14.96% |
| 7 | 1.5 TiB | 11.66 TiB | 0.5% |
| 6 | 13.88 TiB | 95 TiB | 4.1% |
| 1 | 305.44 TiB | 306.03 TiB | 13.22% |
| 1.12 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.