DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 193570

Client ID: f03096678

Report Detail
Report 193570 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

0.55 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
7 issues
Number of providers: 8

f01926635

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

135.69 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.74%

Deal Percentage

48.87% / 66.31 TiB

Duplication

206382

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02224274

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

989.03 TiB

Total Deal Size

34.54%

Deal Percentage

49.51% / 489.63 TiB

Duplication

65105

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02826123

Dongguan, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

497.88 TiB

Total Deal Size

17.39%

Deal Percentage

50.01% / 248.97 TiB

Duplication

195957

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02826234

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

244.28 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.53%

Deal Percentage

0.04% / 96 GiB

Duplication

100934

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02901026

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

19.94 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.7%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

21649

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02948413

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

278.06 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.71%

Deal Percentage

11.36% / 31.59 TiB

Duplication

104300

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02956383

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

199.84 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.98%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

182184

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03079511

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

499.03 TiB

Total Deal Size

17.43%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

177419

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
3 issues
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
8
6.34 TiB
70.97 TiB
2.47%
7
62.81 TiB
642.09 TiB
22.42%
3
20.81 TiB
85.25 TiB
2.97%
1
60.66 TiB
93.44 TiB
3.26%
6
119.41 TiB
957.03 TiB
33.41%
2
201.09 TiB
596.78 TiB
20.83%
5
43.5 TiB
304.75 TiB
10.64%
4
19.38 TiB
113.44 TiB
3.96%
534 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
f02002177
64 GiB
1