f02826123
Dongguan, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
263.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.48%
Deal Percentage
50.03% / 131.97 TiB
Duplication
195957
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
1.68 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Dongguan, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
263.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.48%
Deal Percentage
50.03% / 131.97 TiB
Duplication
195957
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
147.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.31%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
100934
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
407.22 TiB
Total Deal Size
14.64%
Deal Percentage
28.57% / 116.34 TiB
Duplication
123876
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
86.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.13%
Deal Percentage
1.29% / 1.13 TiB
Duplication
112266
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
157.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.66%
Deal Percentage
5.55% / 8.75 TiB
Duplication
104300
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
266 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.56%
Deal Percentage
31.2% / 83 TiB
Duplication
182184
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
499 TiB
Total Deal Size
17.93%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 32 GiB
Duplication
215446
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
857.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
30.82%
Deal Percentage
48.77% / 418.22 TiB
Duplication
122685
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
94 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.38%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
177419
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
2.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.09%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
79098
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 20.31 TiB | 140.09 TiB | 5.03% |
| 3 | 95.94 TiB | 469.16 TiB | 16.86% |
| 4 | 44.88 TiB | 295.63 TiB | 10.62% |
| 7 | 17.5 TiB | 159.69 TiB | 5.73% |
| 10 | 2.06 TiB | 24.88 TiB | 0.89% |
| 8 | 24.75 TiB | 241.19 TiB | 8.66% |
| 2 | 132.25 TiB | 392.41 TiB | 14.1% |
| 6 | 44.16 TiB | 353.47 TiB | 12.7% |
| 9 | 57.06 TiB | 628.97 TiB | 22.6% |
| 1 | 70 TiB | 76.97 TiB | 2.76% |
| 508.91 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||