f02023435
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
49.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.62%
Deal Percentage
3.77% / 1.88 TiB
Duplication
34647
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
N/A
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Activity status not available
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
49.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.62%
Deal Percentage
3.77% / 1.88 TiB
Duplication
34647
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
252.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.23%
Deal Percentage
1.04% / 2.63 TiB
Duplication
97981
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Foshan, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
416.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
13.57%
Deal Percentage
22.39% / 93.25 TiB
Duplication
100930
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
60 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.95%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
116516
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Foshan, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
199.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.5%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
109452
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
60 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.95%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
113584
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
215.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.02%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
102192
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
221.28 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.21%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
163841
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
499.84 TiB
Total Deal Size
16.28%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
210774
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
164.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.36%
Deal Percentage
0.06% / 96 GiB
Duplication
67891
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
649.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
21.17%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
177411
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
100 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.26%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
92143
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
100 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.26%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
80983
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
69.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.28%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
45565
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
10 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.33%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
106881
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 15.38 TiB | 62.16 TiB | 2.02% |
| 9 | 23.34 TiB | 217.25 TiB | 7.07% |
| 14 | 1.38 TiB | 19.75 TiB | 0.64% |
| 13 | 21.84 TiB | 300.75 TiB | 9.79% |
| 15 | 4.44 TiB | 67.41 TiB | 2.19% |
| 11 | 16.81 TiB | 199.66 TiB | 6.5% |
| 8 | 44.28 TiB | 355.84 TiB | 11.59% |
| 2 | 198.56 TiB | 397.13 TiB | 12.93% |
| 10 | 37.41 TiB | 416.22 TiB | 13.56% |
| 3 | 36.16 TiB | 108.56 TiB | 3.53% |
| 6 | 19.91 TiB | 119.56 TiB | 3.89% |
| 1 | 209.59 TiB | 209.59 TiB | 6.82% |
| 5 | 10.84 TiB | 54.28 TiB | 1.76% |
| 12 | 13.22 TiB | 171.03 TiB | 5.57% |
| 7 | 52.78 TiB | 370.22 TiB | 12.06% |
| 705.94 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||