f02023435
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
119.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.63%
Deal Percentage
0.08% / 96 GiB
Duplication
34647
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
4.73 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
119.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.63%
Deal Percentage
0.08% / 96 GiB
Duplication
34647
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The Peak, Central and Western, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
37.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.16%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
34257
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
9.84 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.3%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
100934
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
281.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.58%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 32 GiB
Duplication
109452
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
297.84 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.08%
Deal Percentage
21.67% / 64.53 TiB
Duplication
112266
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
397.28 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.11%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
182184
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
544.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
16.6%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
67891
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
356.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.87%
Deal Percentage
50% / 178.44 TiB
Duplication
95723
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
337.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.3%
Deal Percentage
0.43% / 1.44 TiB
Duplication
33782
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
898.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
27.37%
Deal Percentage
0.13% / 1.13 TiB
Duplication
177419
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Incheon, Incheon, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
32 GiB
Total Deal Size
0%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
35188
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 51.09 TiB | 153.31 TiB | 4.67% |
| 10 | 7.19 TiB | 79.06 TiB | 2.4% |
| 4 | 71.13 TiB | 285.31 TiB | 8.69% |
| 8 | 70.16 TiB | 636.84 TiB | 19.4% |
| 1 | 425.5 TiB | 425.5 TiB | 12.96% |
| 5 | 49.34 TiB | 251.09 TiB | 7.65% |
| 7 | 69.69 TiB | 578.91 TiB | 17.64% |
| 6 | 57.59 TiB | 388.78 TiB | 11.84% |
| 2 | 125.53 TiB | 251.34 TiB | 7.65% |
| 9 | 23.16 TiB | 231.47 TiB | 7.05% |
| 950.38 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||