Allocators

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability
f01053413	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	415.31 TiB	10.98%	0.46%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f02098007	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	32 GiB	0.00%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f02182251	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	82.88 TiB	2.19%	0.23%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f02825282	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	398 TiB	10.52%	11.87%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f02825444	Singapore, Singapore, SG	94.56 TiB	2.50%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f02825855	Paripark, Seoul, KR	91.34 TiB	2.41%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f02826123	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	444.34 TiB	11.74%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f02826234	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	351.06 TiB	9.28%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f02826253	Singapore, Singapore, SG	97.06 TiB	2.57%	0.03%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f03078086	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	537.53 TiB	14.21%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f03126993	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	125.47 TiB	3.32%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f03226688	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	601.13 TiB	15.89%	0.42%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f03226691	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	544.59 TiB	14.39%	8.72%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

Healthy

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	106.78 TiB	106.78 TiB	2.82%
2	64 GiB	128 GiB	0%
3	4.16 TiB	12.47 TiB	0.32%
4	58.72 TiB	235.5 TiB	6.22%
5	191.25 TiB	957.56 TiB	25.3%
6	104.41 TiB	626.84 TiB	16.56%
7	155.06 TiB	1.08 PiB	29.18%
8	66.78 TiB	598.56 TiB	15.82%
9	14.16 TiB	141.53 TiB	3.74%
	701.38 TiB Total

Low provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.