Glif auto verified, CaptaiNLP

Client ID: f03054979

Report Detail
Report 12005 from 2025-01-27 03:12

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
3 issues
Number of providers: 8
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate (via HTTP)
f02826123
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
298.84 TiB
9.43%
0.25%
No
N/A
0.00%(0%)
f02826234
Foshan, Guangdong, CN
296.25 TiB
9.34%
16.03%
No
N/A
0.00%(0%)
f02956383
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
392.47 TiB
12.38%
0.00%
No
N/A
0.00%(0%)
f02980903
Seoul, Seoul, KR
399.88 TiB
12.61%
0.00%
No
N/A
0.00%(0%)
f03046248
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
299.94 TiB
9.46%
0.00%
No
N/A
0.00%(0%)
f03064819
Seoul, Seoul, KR
280.75 TiB
8.85%
0.00%
No
N/A
0.00%(0%)
f03066382
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
193.25 TiB
6.09%
0.52%
No
N/A
0.00%(0%)
f03079511
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
1009.34 TiB
31.83%
0.02%
No
N/A
0.00%(0%)

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
427.66 TiB
427.66 TiB
13.48%
2
59.44 TiB
118.91 TiB
3.75%
3
54.66 TiB
164.09 TiB
5.17%
4
210.66 TiB
846.97 TiB
26.71%
5
173.53 TiB
904.47 TiB
28.52%
6
115.44 TiB
700.69 TiB
22.09%
7
1.13 TiB
7.94 TiB
0.25%
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
f03146638
16.41 TiB
175