DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 198340

Client ID: f02946590

Report Detail
Report 198340 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

0.16 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from multiple allocators.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
6 issues
Number of providers: 8

f01946104

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

887.91 TiB

Total Deal Size

23.64%

Deal Percentage

49.6% / 440.41 TiB

Duplication

118680

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02035252

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

72.03 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.92%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

10485

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02889390

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

1.58 PiB

Total Deal Size

42.98%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

79037

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02933536

Yinchuan, Ningxia, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

43.56 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.16%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

5507

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02933563

Yinchuan, Ningxia, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

33.25 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.89%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

5011

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02966277

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

349.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.32%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

28086

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03083319

Qingdao, Shandong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

555.06 TiB

Total Deal Size

14.78%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

50437

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03096886

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

200.09 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.33%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

16173

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
2 issues
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
1
378.88 TiB
379.03 TiB
10.09%
5
2.94 TiB
15.13 TiB
0.4%
4
16 TiB
65.16 TiB
1.73%
2
796.28 TiB
1.73 PiB
47.24%
3
421.88 TiB
1.49 PiB
40.52%
1.58 PiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.