f01128206
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
146.09 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.99%
Deal Percentage
0.17% / 256 GiB
Duplication
5861
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
0.02 day
Client is receiving DataCap from multiple allocators.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
146.09 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.99%
Deal Percentage
0.17% / 256 GiB
Duplication
5861
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
425.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.8%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 64 GiB
Duplication
40562
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Bucharest, Bucharest, RO
Sample Piece URL not found
11.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.16%
Deal Percentage
55.22% / 6.28 TiB
Duplication
2290
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
591.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.07%
Deal Percentage
50% / 295.97 TiB
Duplication
92398
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
1.28 PiB
Total Deal Size
17.88%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 128 GiB
Duplication
75317
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
813.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.08%
Deal Percentage
49.93% / 406.06 TiB
Duplication
84860
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
1.33 PiB
Total Deal Size
18.61%
Deal Percentage
50% / 682.78 TiB
Duplication
72080
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Manila, National Capital Region, PH
Sample Piece URL not found
1.05 PiB
Total Deal Size
14.68%
Deal Percentage
30.14% / 324.59 TiB
Duplication
96928
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Beijing, Beijing, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
1.56 PiB
Total Deal Size
21.75%
Deal Percentage
29.24% / 466.66 TiB
Duplication
142221
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 462 TiB | 2.68 PiB | 37.39% |
| 3 | 384.94 TiB | 1.59 PiB | 22.21% |
| 2 | 223.19 TiB | 546.22 TiB | 7.44% |
| 1 | 99.56 TiB | 111 TiB | 1.51% |
| 5 | 248.66 TiB | 1.7 PiB | 23.77% |
| 7 | 16.06 TiB | 176.75 TiB | 2.4% |
| 6 | 41.88 TiB | 385.44 TiB | 5.25% |
| 1.44 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| f03040407 | 22.28 TiB | 163 |