FIDL Enterprise Data

Allocator ID: f03015757

PulseView on Filecoin Pulse GitHubView Registry JSON File

Remaining DataCap

14 PiB

Report Detail

Report 441cdb88...6960 from

Allocator Overview

Chain Address

f27v...5niy

Number of Clients

Is Multisig

Yes

Average Retrievability Success Rate

9.71%

Required Copies

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

Audit Types

Enterprise Data

Clients overview

Clients marked with are using Client contract.

Clients marked with received DataCap from more than one allocator.

Status:

2 issues

ID	Name	Total Allocations	Time Since Last Allocation	Spending Speed	Date of Application	Has Enough Replicas	Latest Report
f01955887	AGENCJAPROMOCJI MOTORYZACJI A....	200 TiB in 2 allocations See Breakdown	491 days	416.26 GiB / day	20/03/2024 08:14	No	View Report
f03051688	AGENCJAPROMOCJI MOTORYZACJI A....	2.94 PiB in 3 allocations See Breakdown	366 days	6.35 TiB / day	08/04/2024 16:20	Yes	View Report
f03065156	theskyzone	3.51 PiB in 6 allocations See Breakdown	107 days	7.74 TiB / day	10/04/2024 23:37	Yes	View Report
f03131523	ePublishing	7.19 PiB in 6 allocations See Breakdown	62 days	17.66 TiB / day	17/05/2024 13:41	No	View Report
f03137377	FilecoinFoundation	100 GiB in 1 allocation See Breakdown	409 days	250.37 MiB / day	13/06/2024 17:18	Yes	View Report
f03183111	TheStarling Lab	2.13 PiB in 4 allocations See Breakdown	83 days	6.39 TiB / day	05/08/2024 16:08	No	View Report
f03189689	FilecoinFoundation	100 GiB in 1 allocation See Breakdown	333 days	307.51 MiB / day	28/08/2024 17:10	Yes	View Report
f03231214	BeijingTangxiang Technology Co...	1000 TiB in 5 allocations See Breakdown	209 days	3.58 TiB / day	13/09/2024 16:45	Yes	View Report
f03253574	N/A	788 TiB in 4 allocations See Breakdown	128 days	3.23 TiB / day	30/01/2025 05:59	No	View Report

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this allocator.

Number of providers: 37

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability	RPA
f01115949	Seoul, Seoul, KR	352.53 TiB	3.04%	0.45%	14549	81.82%	81.82%	0.00%
f01127678	Poznań, Greater Poland, PL	667.06 TiB	5.76%	0.00%	21346	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01222595	Moscow, Moscow, RU	389.76 TiB	3.36%	0.34%	18450	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01222595	Moscow, Moscow, RU	67.59 TiB	0.58%	0.00%	18450	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f0137489	Canvey Island, England, GB	32 GiB	0.00%	0.00%	179	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01404908	Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, KR	46.69 TiB	0.40%	0.13%	1497	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01619524	Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE	232.8 TiB	2.01%	1.62%	7452	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01770778	Seoul, Seoul, KR	349.94 TiB	3.02%	0.01%	14723	100.00%	100.00%	0.00%
f0187709	Moscow, Moscow, RU	243.65 TiB	2.10%	0.03%	10361	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01888808	Bucharest, București, RO	64 GiB	0.00%	0.00%	1145	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01900525	Seoul, Seoul, KR	430.84 TiB	3.72%	0.00%	16682	36.36%	36.36%	0.00%
f01924824	Seoul, Seoul, KR	467.28 TiB	4.03%	0.10%	17862	42.11%	42.11%	0.00%
f01924891	Seoul, Seoul, KR	455.63 TiB	3.93%	0.01%	17069	16.67%	16.67%	0.00%
f01927163	Seoul, Seoul, KR	440.56 TiB	3.80%	0.01%	17262	18.18%	18.18%	0.00%
f02770730	Poznań, Greater Poland, PL	81.5 TiB	0.70%	0.00%	3631	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02770730	Poznań, Greater Poland, PL	31.95 TiB	0.28%	0.00%	3631	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02814100	Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE	98.7 TiB	0.85%	2.75%	3159	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02860778	Seoul, Seoul, KR	1.09 TiB	0.01%	0.00%	1534	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02860778	Seoul, Seoul, KR	64 GiB	0.00%	0.00%	1534	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02860783	Seoul, Seoul, KR	13.81 TiB	0.12%	0.00%	1367	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02927579	Poznań, Greater Poland, PL	261.7 TiB	2.26%	28.39%	14954	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02927579	Poznań, Greater Poland, PL	205.48 TiB	1.77%	0.00%	14954	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02943119	Chinch'ŏn, North Chungcheong, KR	32 GiB	0.00%	0.00%	1517	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03046733	N/A	1.46 PiB	12.86%	0.13%	47742	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03112506	Ashburn, Virginia, US	1.7 PiB	15.02%	0.07%	55987	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03112580	Ashburn, Virginia, US	1.93 PiB	17.08%	0.00%	64975	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03143698	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	227.78 TiB	1.97%	0.00%	11879	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03143705	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	151.81 TiB	1.31%	0.00%	4858	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03228920	San Jose, California, US	152.28 TiB	1.31%	0.00%	4873	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03228923	San Jose, California, US	162.56 TiB	1.40%	0.00%	5202	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03270850	San Francisco, California, US	256 MiB	0.00%	0.00%	16357	64.29%	64.29%	0.00%
f03284180	Ashburn, Virginia, US	754.53 TiB	6.51%	0.00%	24145	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03383926	Seoul, Seoul, KR	7.41 TiB	0.06%	2.11%	368	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03601035	Missouri City, Texas, US	16.55 TiB	0.14%	0.00%	531	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f0717969	Los Angeles, California, US	352 GiB	0.00%	0.00%	43500	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f099608	Riga, Riga, LV	60.25 TiB	0.52%	0.00%	2119	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f099608	Riga, Riga, LV	5.97 TiB	0.05%	0.00%	2119	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Allocators

Ecosystem

FIDL Enterprise Data

Remaining DataCap

Allocator Overview

Chain Address

Number of Clients

Is Multisig

Average Retrievability Success Rate

Required Copies

Average Time To First Deal

Audit Types

Clients overview

Storage Provider Distribution

Allocator Overview

Chain Address

Number of Clients

Is Multisig

Average Retrievability Success Rate

Required Copies

Average Time To First Deal

Audit Types

Clients overview

Storage Provider Distribution